A Distinction Without a Difference

A Distinction Without a Difference

Mark Lazar’s August 2020 Newsletter

Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason. Mark Twain

November 3rd is fast approaching. In addition to the presidential election, voters will decide the outcome of 35 senatorial seats and 435 Congressional seats. Political tensions are running higher than ever. But despite the hand-wringing between now and then—on both sides of the political aisle—this too shall pass.

In addition to providing a place for buyers to make a (hopefully) profitable investment, and sellers the ability to liquidate shares, the stock market is also a price mechanism, a signaling mechanism, a feedback mechanism, and a harbinger of the future. Security prices reflect the collective wisdom of the entire human species. In other words, at any given moment, the share price of Apple is exactly what eight billion people agree it should be.

While not perfect, markets can and do signal expectations of election outcomes. In fact, since 1928 the stock market has correctly predicted the winner of the presidential election 87% of the time. According to Ryan Detrick, senior market strategist at LPL, “When the S&P 500 has been higher the 3 months before the election, the incumbent party usually won; whereas when stocks were lower, the incumbent usually lost,” Which begs the question, what is the market signaling today? The following are a few observations that are worth noting:

What do elections cycles mean to the stock market? According to research by Fidelity Investments, the first two years of a presidential term tend to produce below-average returns, while the last two years’ returns are well-above average. However, over the full four-year term, the average difference is statistically insignificant. Furthermore, over a two-year period, the market does better following a Republican win (+8.3%) than a Democrat win (+5.8%). And when the Republicans sweep, the difference is even more extreme with the two-year average return of 12.2% versus a Democrat sweep producing 3.4%. But when measured over the four-year term, the difference is much less (+8.6% versus +8.2%).

But not all Administrations are created equal. For example, the Clinton Administration’s policies—a reduction in the capital gains rate, deregulation, the largest welfare reform in history, plus a budget surplus for four consecutive years—were cheered by the market. At the end of Clinton’s term the economy averaged 3.89% growth and the stock market returned 12.63% per year.

Likewise, Reagan cut business and personal tax rates, and deregulated; the economy grew at nearly 3.5% per year and the market averaged over 9% during the same period.

At the end of the day, the stock market is indifferent to politics. However, the market is very concerned about policies that affect earnings. Expectations of policies that reward capital investment, innovation, entrepreneurship, hard work, and thrift, will be rewarded with higher earnings multiples (i.e. stock prices). Whereas contrary policies, or those that impede free markets, interfere with trade, and punish capital and savings, will do the very opposite.

Human nature isn’t complex; when you reward something, you get more of it. When you punish something, you get less.

Mark Lazar, MBA
Certified Financial Planner™
Pathwaytoprosperity.com

Views expressed in this newsletter are the current opinion of the author, but not necessarily those of Raymond James & Associates. The author's opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained in this report was received from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results. There is no assurance these trends will continue or that forecasts mentioned will occur. Investing always involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss. No investment strategy can guarantee success. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of 30 widely held securities. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Companies engaged in business related to a specific sector are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associated with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the annual market value of all goods and services produced domestically by the US. The information in this article is general in nature, is not a complete statement of all information necessary for making an investment decision, and is not a recommendation or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Investments and strategies mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users and/or members. Raymond James is not affiliated with any of the organizations listed above. Neither Raymond James Financial Services no any Raymond James Financial Advisor renders advice on tax issues, these matters should be discussed with the appropriate professional. Investing in commodities is generally considered speculative because of the significant potential for investment loss. Their markets are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising. Gold is subject to the special risks associated with investing in precious metals, including but not limited to: price may be subject to wide fluctuation; the market is relatively limited; the sources are concentrated in countries that have the potential for instability; and the market is unregulated. Be advised that investments in real estate and in REITs have various risks, including possible lack of liquidity and devaluation based on adverse economic and regulatory changes. Additionally, investments in REIT's will fluctuate with the value of the underlying properties, and the price at redemption may be more or less than the original price paid. Sector investments are companies engaged in business related to a specific sector. They are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associated with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. Donors are urged to consult their attorneys, accountants or tax advisors with respect to questions relating to the deductibility of various types of contributions to a Donor-Advised Fund for federal and state tax purposes.