That’s Going to Leave a Mark

That’s Going to Leave a Mark

Mark Lazar’s November 2021 Newsletter

It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest. Adam Smith

Item YTD Change
Dow Jones Ind Avg 17.03%
S&P 500 Index 22.61%
EAFE Foreign Index 8.75%
Barclays Agg Bond Index -1.58%
10-Year Inflation Forecast 2.51%
2021 GDP Growth Forecast 6.7%
Unemployment Rate 4.8%

*Market index data as of 10/31/2021

Since this month’s commentary is lengthier than normal, let’s get right to the point; Inflation, which occurs when price levels broadly rise. Deflation is just the opposite, and generally associated with periods of severe economic contraction. Simple enough. There are many measures of inflation, but the two most common being the Consumer Price Index (CPI), released by the BLS, and the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE), tracked by the BEA. Of the two, the CPI probably gets more press, as it is used to adjust Social Security payments.

Inflation is calculated by adding up the prices of thousands of different things and comparing them to the prices for the same items in the prior period. The CPI currently includes 200 categories, arranged into eight major groups; food/beverages, housing, apparel, transportation, medical, recreation, education, and other goods and services.

Those of us who live in the real-world focus on headline inflation measures, like CPI, constructed to reflect the typical consumer’s expenditures. However, the Fed’s preferred gauge is core inflation, which excludes food and energy. Why, you might ask? Because food and energy prices are subject to wild short-term swings, which can skew the data. Examples include oil shocks, weather events, geopolitical flare-ups, etc. 

Economists commonly debate the cause of inflation. However, Milton Friedman explained it best, “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,” meaning at the end of the day, central banks are the culprit. But increasing the money supply only causes inflation if output doesn’t increase at the same or greater pace. If the Fed increases the money supply 25%, as it did in 2020, but output—the ability to produce goods and service—increased by 30% (e.g., due to a leap in technology and innovation), prices would fall; deflation. In sharp contrast to the high inflation of the 70s and early 80s, the past decade witnessed below-trend inflation. Between 2010–2020 inflation averaged just 1.75%, whereas since 1913 the rate has averaged 3.10%, which includes the Great Depression, a period of secular deflation

What’s causing the inflation rate, currently 5.4%, to spike 300% compared to the previous decade? Two things; unprecedented money printing and pandemic restrictions, which led to the current supply chain dilemma. Industrial production is still 9% below 2019/pre-COVID levels, yet during that same period the money supply increased a whopping 41%. To put it simply, the Fed printed money to boost spending and inflate asset prices while, at the same time, output collapsed 24% (April 2020). 

The charts below, money supply and industrial production, are both five-year snapshots. Notice the divergence that occurs in early 2020. 

M2 Money Supply: ~$21 Trillion

M2 Money Supply-FRED

 US Industrial Production Index: 109      

Industrial Production-Macrotrends

The term transitory became policymakers’ favorite adjective in 2021, virtually always preceding the word inflation. Over the past year, neither the Treasury secretary nor the Fed chair can seemingly issue a statement without uttering the word as if it had some kind of magical power, and if spoken enough would become true. But Washington politicians (and US monetary institution appointees) have never built a company or created anything. They simply can’t fathom that a business doesn’t work in the manner as a political bureaucrat; that they can turn off the light switch one day, then turn it on the next without resulting in massive disruptions. The supply chain issues today are the direct result from business decisions made 12–18 months ago. Hiring, CAPEX (investing in new equipment, land acquisition, plant construction, etc.), expansion plans, mergers, acquisitions, R&D projects, vendor agreements, etc., were either cancelled or put on hold due to uncertainty. The market is many things; a price mechanism, an efficient allocator of resources, a feedback mechanism, etc., but it’s also a signaling mechanism. Business leaders continually read the tea leaves to, hopefully, make better decisions today that allow them to better serve their customers tomorrow—not out of some misplaced sense of virtue or for the greater good, but for a profit motive.

Nominal US GDP is actually higher (real GDP, net of inflation, is lower, however) today than it would have been absent the COVID pandemic. Record scratch! How is that possible? Answer; Keynesian, demand-side economic policies; historic borrowing and money printing, allowed Uncle Sam to issue record stimulus checks to individuals and businesses, bail out indebted states and pension plans, and provide excess unemployment benefits, all of which put dollars in consumers’ and investors’ hands—and they did not disappoint. Both real estate and the stock market are hitting record highs. Stocks and residential real estate are up 40% and 18%, respectively. This is fantastic for the wealthy, who typically own both. But what about real wages, meaning wages after inflation, which is what matters to the average worker, most of whom don’t have stock and real estate portfolios? Over the twelve-month period ending in September 2021, real wages were down ~1%

Washington policymakers are literally taking a victory lap for higher fuel costs (up 58% YOY), supply chain disruptions, the shipping container debacle, increased food costs (up 27% YOY), and empty shelves, pointing to a successful recovery plan as the reason. Poppycock! Demand creates supply, and the market gladly produces enough widgets to meet demand if the government doesn’t prevent it from doing so. For the wealthy, life is good! Their net worth has never been higher. But for working-class, blue-collar Americans, who have few, if any, investments and rely instead on their wages to live, their standard of living is lower today than it was a year ago. That’s going to leave a mark.

Mark Lazar, MBA
Senior Vice President–Investments
Certified Financial Planner™

Views expressed in this newsletter are the current opinion of the author, but not necessarily those of Raymond James & Associates. The author's opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained in this report was received from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results. There is no assurance these trends will continue or that forecasts mentioned will occur. Investing always involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss. No investment strategy can guarantee success. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of 30 widely held securities. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Companies engaged in business related to a specific sector are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associated with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the annual market value of all goods and services produced domestically by the US. The information in this article is general in nature, is not a complete statement of all information necessary for making an investment decision, and is not a recommendation or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Investments and strategies mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users and/or members. Raymond James is not affiliated with any of the organizations listed above. Neither Raymond James Financial Services no any Raymond James Financial Advisor renders advice on tax issues, these matters should be discussed with the appropriate professional. Investing in commodities is generally considered speculative because of the significant potential for investment loss. Their markets are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising. Gold is subject to the special risks associated with investing in precious metals, including but not limited to: price may be subject to wide fluctuation; the market is relatively limited; the sources are concentrated in countries that have the potential for instability; and the market is unregulated. Be advised that investments in real estate and in REITs have various risks, including possible lack of liquidity and devaluation based on adverse economic and regulatory changes. Additionally, investments in REIT's will fluctuate with the value of the underlying properties, and the price at redemption may be more or less than the original price paid. Sector investments are companies engaged in business related to a specific sector. They are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associated with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. Donors are urged to consult their attorneys, accountants or tax advisors with respect to questions relating to the deductibility of various types of contributions to a Donor-Advised Fund for federal and state tax purposes.