The Madness of Crowds

The Madness of Crowds

Mark Lazar’s March 2020 Newsletter

When the herd is all running toward a cliff, the one running the opposite direction seems crazy—Unknown

You would be hard-pressed to pick up a newspaper, turn to your favorite news channel, or open a web browser without seeing a terrifying headline about the Coronavirus, AKA COVID-19. I know nothing about epidemiology, but I do know thus far there have been twenty-eight deaths in the US due to the virus. While loss of life is always a tragedy, compared to the 80,000 (nearly 7,000 per month) deaths that occurred in 2017/2018 from the flu, the current epidemic seems to pale by comparison, at least thus far. However, despite the low number of fatalities, the markets (stock, bond, and commodities) have experienced extreme levels of volatility over the past three weeks.

Business schools around the world teach a concept known as the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), which posits that security prices reflect all available information and expectations. The EMH assumes markets are informationally symmetrical, meaning buyers and sellers have access to the same data, and that all known information, such as past history and future expectations, is reflected in the price. If the EMH holds true, the market is currently behaving rationally based on rapidly changing expectations of economic activity, retail sales, profit margins, employment/wage data, etc.

In 1720, after losing most of his personal fortune (about $5 million in 2020 dollars) speculating on the South Sea Company, Sir Isaac Newton reportedly muttered, “I can calculate the motions of the heavenly bodies, but not the madness of men.” Newton’s view of the universe as both orderly and predictable may translate nicely to physics but not nearly as well to the stock market.

It’s important to understand what the stock market, or any market, for that matter, really is: a price mechanism. Every day hundreds of millions of market participants—individual, retail, and institutional investors—are exposed to billions of random data points, such as corporate revenues, earnings, macro-economic data, fiscal policy changes, geopolitical events, epidemics, etc. Buyers and sellers independently gather this information and come together to create a market that ultimately determines the precise value of a share of Coca Cola, or any other security, for that matter.

I would contend markets are long run efficient; meaning that, over time, price and value tend to be one and the same. However, in the short run markets can be terribly inefficient, which is why we have periodic asset bubbles (stock, real estate, commodities, bitcoin, tulips, etc.) followed by subsequent corrections. Markets eventually get it right and either sell off overpriced assets or bid up underpriced assets, but in the short run a divergence between price and value is not uncommon, as Sir Isaac Newton learned the hard way.

I liken the recent stock market selloff to sitting in a crowded theater, enjoying a much-anticipated movie. In the middle of the show you notice half a dozen people heading for the side exit. A minute later, another half a dozen, followed by another half a dozen, then another. At some point you begin to scan the theater, looking for the reason. A fire, perhaps? A crazed lunatic? But there is nothing. Another half a dozen head for the exit, at which point you get up a, believing they must know something that you don’t. Outside the theater you ask someone why they left. They answer, “I don’t know. I just saw everyone else leaving, so I decided to follow.”

This is not 2007. Stocks are cheap relative to forward earnings, housing isn’t in a bubble, subprime mortgages aren’t the norm, credit default swaps aren’t a “thing,” and US banks’ are solid with tier one capital ratios healthier than they’ve been in years. In fact, despite the barrage of negative headlines, the recent economic data has been encouraging:

⦁ Nonfarm payrolls grew by  273,000 for both January and February.
⦁ Unemployment at  3.5% is at a 60 year low.
⦁ Retail sales was up  4.4% in January versus the prior year.
⦁ At 1.597 million annualized rate for December and January, housing starts are enjoying their fastest pace for any two month period since 2006.
⦁ The Atlanta Fed projects U.S. GDP is on track for 3.1% annual growth rate in the first quarter.
⦁ The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index for February ticked up to 104.5 from 104.3 in January.

A number of people recently asked if it’s wise to simply sell their stocks and wait on the sidelines until things are better. I don’t know when the market will find the bottom. But find the bottom it will, and I suspect it happens sooner rather than later. As the chart below illustrates, in the midst of the Great Recession, the stock market found its bottom March 9, 2009. I remember keenly how awful things felt; at 8.1%, unemployment hit a 25-year high, 140 banks failed that year, and systemically important banks were forced to accept a lifeline from the Treasury known as TARP. Foreclosure signs were ubiquitous, housing developments were abandoned, shopping center were littered with vacancy signs, GM was preparing to file bankruptcy, and layoffs were rampant. Yet, when it appeared things couldn’t get any worse, the market found its bottom and stock prices began to rise.

Yahoo Finance

Last week Warren Buffett, arguably the most successful investor in recent history, purchased nearly one million additional shares of Delta Airlines. The Oracle of Omaha doesn’t attempt to pick the bottom. Rather, he isn’t afraid to invest in companies he perceives are attractively priced. I don’t know when the selloff is over. But I do know I’d rather emulate Warren Buffett than the madness of crowds.

Mark Lazar, MBA
Certified Financial Planner®

Views expressed in this newsletter are the current opinion of the author, but not necessarily those of Raymond James & Associates. The author's opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained in this report was received from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results. There is no assurance these trends will continue or that forecasts mentioned will occur. Investing always involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss. No investment strategy can guarantee success. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of 30 widely held securities. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Companies engaged in business related to a specific sector are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associated with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the annual market value of all goods and services produced domestically by the US. The information in this article is general in nature, is not a complete statement of all information necessary for making an investment decision, and is not a recommendation or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Investments and strategies mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users and/or members. Raymond James is not affiliated with any of the organizations listed above. Neither Raymond James Financial Services no any Raymond James Financial Advisor renders advice on tax issues, these matters should be discussed with the appropriate professional. Investing in commodities is generally considered speculative because of the significant potential for investment loss. Their markets are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising. Gold is subject to the special risks associated with investing in precious metals, including but not limited to: price may be subject to wide fluctuation; the market is relatively limited; the sources are concentrated in countries that have the potential for instability; and the market is unregulated. Be advised that investments in real estate and in REITs have various risks, including possible lack of liquidity and devaluation based on adverse economic and regulatory changes. Additionally, investments in REIT's will fluctuate with the value of the underlying properties, and the price at redemption may be more or less than the original price paid. Sector investments are companies engaged in business related to a specific sector. They are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associated with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. Donors are urged to consult their attorneys, accountants or tax advisors with respect to questions relating to the deductibility of various types of contributions to a Donor-Advised Fund for federal and state tax purposes.